Adaptation

The Invasion

I love Nicole Kidman, though I think that most people do. Which was the main pull to watch this film. I enjoyed the other film adaptations The Body Snatchers that I’ve seen. Which is limited to the 1978, and 1993 versions. Though even with the addition of this version, my favorite is still the 1978 version. Because Donald Sutherland. The Invasion is close though, through the power of Nicole Kidman’s performance and the films many great moments.

The Invasion opens with a shuttle crashing and falling to earth during reentry. The debris from the crash is infested with an alien virus that can survive the freezing environment of space and the burning reentry. The virus infects people and taking them over when they enter REM sleep. One of the first people infected is the CDC director Tucker Kaufman (Jeremy Northam). Tucker’s ex-wife Carol Bennell (Nicole Kidman) is a practicing psychiatrist, who has patient that thinks her husband is no longer her husband. Having a complete change of temperament. Slowly Carol starts noticing strange behavior in those around her. Including Tucker’s sudden interest in being a father to his son Oliver (Jackson Bond) and asking for visitation. As her fears mount and after the discovery of a strange skin is discovered at a party. Carol turns to her boyfriend Ben Driscoll (Daniel Craig). He in turn goes to his friend Dr. Stephen Galeano (Jeffrey Wright), and they learn of the spread of virus. Which is being spread by Tucker through a flu vaccine. After realizing that Tucker is infected she goes to rescue her son, who she has also learned is immune due to being sick as a baby with a specific strain of the chicken pox. But as Carol searches for her son, things get more complicated after she becomes infected by Tucker. Forced to stay awake and find her son, before the infected learn of his immunity.

I liked the build up. The slow start of the familiar that builds upon itself as the film progresses. Layering upon itself. As it like its predecessors address the concept of a world with out violence is a world with out humanity and anyone is capable of anything in the right situation plays out beautifully.

My favorite parts were the quieter moments after the Carol has realized of the invasion. When other non infected warn her on the subway and later when she escapes. To avoid emotion as they dont have any. Something that’s used against us by them. The work great and add a great deal to the tension of the film.

It was the cast that really stood out to me. With exception of Daniel Craig, who felt dry and unemotional. Nicole Kidman of course did an outstanding job. But like he’s done before my favorite performance was from Jeffery Wright. Who, while only a smaller supporting role uses his screen time the most effectively.

Final thoughts, Overall I really enjoyed this version and while not my favorite I can still admit that it’s well done.  The acting is solid though not as well done in the 1978 version and the story is solid. I like the undercurrents of the film, though the get very heavy handed with them. But if your a fan of invasion films or the other versions of Invasion of the Body Snatchers I would recommend giving this film a watch. 7/10

Pride and Prejudice and Zombies

n8itxirFirst of all I feel the need to bring up that I’m not a fan of Jane Austin. I’m not saying she wasn’t a talented and influential writer, both of which she was. I’m not a fan of any real works of that period as I find that language arduous to get through and you need to have a firm understanding of the social structure of the time. Which is something I do not possess. That said, I am aware of her works and the cliff notes version of a meager handful of her novels. Mostly from friends who are more devoted fans than I could ever be. I went into this film with my head full of the bad reviews and internet trash talk that I had come across since its release. So when I got a steaming bowl of pretty OK, I was more than pleasantly surprised.

The film recaps the rise of zombie apocalypse across 19th century Europe, before getting to the Bennet sisters, Elizabeth (Lily James), Jane (Bella Heathcote), Kitty (Suki Waterhouse), Lydia (Ellie Bamber), and Mary (Millie Brady). The five sisters have received martial training in China, rather than in Japan as is considered fashionable among the wealthy at their father’s (Charles Dance) behest. A decision that the girl’s mother (Sally Phillips) disapproves with as she feels that it makes them less desirable for marriage. We also get quickly introduced to Colonel Darcy (Sam Riley), who hunts and fights the zombie menace with the aid of carrion flies. Mrs. Bennet’s worries of proper suitors are soon alleviated when the rich Mr. Bingly (Douglas Booth) moves into the nearby estate. While attending a ball there, Mr. Bingly and falls for Jane, while Mr. Bingly’s close friend Colonel Darcy falls for Elizabeth and her for him. Though through hardheadedness and miss conceptions neither is willing to admit their feelings for the other. Things get worse when Mr. Bingly breaks off his relationship with Jane and leaves the area abruptly. Elizabeth later learns he had done so on the advice of Wickham (Jack Huston), a soldier that shares history with Darcy. But dark times are ahead as Elizabeth keeps seeing visions of the Four Horsemen of the Zombie Apocalypse…

I honestly don’t get people’s complaints that this film isn’t that great of zombie film, or that it’s not that faithful of an adaptation of Jane Austin. Since it’s not intended to be either as it’s based on the 2009 novel of the same name by Seth Grahame-Smith. It feels more like a tongue in cheek joke on both, and for me it hits a real good blend. The action scenes are spaced out to keep the focus more on the relationships of the characters. With their marriage opportunities being the forefront over zombies.

Not that zombies ever fade from the film long enough to even begin to forget about them. As there is enough zombie action in this film to sate my appetite. My only issue with the zombie end of things is the battle scenes not being gruesome enough. Not that I require a vast amount of viscera in my zombie films. But the lack of gore during a the larger battle scenes is felt.

My one main gripe is that I was never worried for any of the principal characters. Given that it’s a spoof on Pride and Prejudice, all the main characters have solid plot armor. I wish that this film would have gone against the grain and killed off one of the sisters at least. Maybe even one of the suitors or even Mr. Bennet. Since knowing that they will survive on the grace of being established characters feels cheap.

Final Thoughts, I will admit that this film is no modern masterpiece. It is fun and entertaining, though. Which is a films primary goal. OK, maybe not fun. But most certainly entertaining. Pride and Prejudice and Zombies never tries to be deep, which is good since it would lack the chops to do so. Instead it goes for a cheeky zombie romp through classic literature. Some I’m more than happy to sit through. 8/10

Dreamcatcher

dreamcatcherI remember the first time I watched this film, I didn’t really enjoy it all that much. I was hung up on some pretty shallow problems with the film. After watching it again, in a different point in my life I found Dreamcatcher far more enjoyable. But still, it’s not even close to King’s best adaptations. That would of course be The Green Mile. Though what I found delightful were the performances of the film’s main protagonists played by Thomas Jane, Jason Lee, Damian Lewis, and Timothy Olyphant. All actors that I’ve come to love in the years since I last saw this film.

Dreamcatchers opens with a group of childhood friends Henry (Thomas Jane), Beaver (Jason Lee), Jonesy (Damian Lewis), and Pete (Timothy Olyphant) planning a trip to go see Duddits (Donnie Wahlberg), another childhood friend. This time also establishes that all four of the friends share special abilities ranging from finding things that are lost, telepathy and precognition. Though other than telepathy not all the abilities are shared among all of them. While leaving work after finalizing plans to visit Duddits, Jonesy walks into the road seemingly in a daze. Which results in him being hit and badly injured. Though he manages to make a near full recovery to attend the group’s annual trip to a cabin in the woods six months later. Though due to the damage to his hip and legs, he walks with a limp and gets fatigued quickly. We learn the that four boys meet Duddits, who is seemingly mentally handicapped while investigating an old building in search of a dirty picture. Duddits was being tormented by three older boys, who are trying to force Duddits to eat a dog turd after they stripped him down. The four boys stand up for him, causing the bullies to back down and forging a lasting friendship with Duddits. It’s also revealed that it was Duddits who had given the boys their mental powers, while searching for a lost girl. In present day Jonesy comes across a lost hunter in the woods Rick McCarthy (Eris Keenleyside), while hunting in the woods with Beaver. He takes Rick back to the cabin and tries to help him. Shortly after settling Rick down and noticing his swollen chest, Beaver returns. Beaver notes the red rash on the mans face, who casually dismisses claiming that it’s an allergic reaction to something. After a few moments Beaver and Jonesy help the man to bed, and while doing so Jonesy notices the swelling has moved from his chest to his stomach. The two then witnesses the animals of the forest fleeing something, many covered with a strange red rash. Much like the one on Rick’s face. A military helicopter flies over head telling them that the area is under quarantine. Meanwhile, Henry and Pete are making a supply run back in town. While making the return trips the two crests a snow-covered hill and nearly strike a woman sitting in the road half-frozen. The two manage to avoid hitting her, but wreck their car and Pete’s leg gets injured. After starting a fire to warm the woman and Pete, Henry leaves on foot back to the cabin to get help. At the cabin, when Beaver and Jonesy reenter they find a bloody trail leading from the bed where Rick was sleeping to the bathroom. After refusing to open the door for them to check on him, Beaver and Jonesy break it down. Inside they find a horror show, as the bathroom is covered in the red rash, growing along the walls floor and completely covering Rick’s face. They hear a “Clinker” drop into the toilet from an unresponsive Rick and when Beaver tries to rouse him, he falls over into the tub dead. Inside the toilet is a large slug like creature, Beaver quickly traps the creature by closing and siting the lid. After arguing about it, Jonesy goes to the shed to find duct tape to keep the lid closed. While gone Beaver is unable to keep the lid closed and is killed after fighting the creature. Jonesy returns to the bathroom and finds Beaver dead, but manages to close the door before the creature and kill him too. Though that does nothing to protect him from the large alien that possesses him. These events haven’t gone unnoticed by the government as Col. Abraham Curtis (Morgan Freeman) is the man who established the quarantine to keep the infection along with aliens that cause it contained. He’s aided by his protege Owen (Tom Sizemore), who’s set to take over his command. Though he’s deeply conflicted over Curtis heavy-handed measures, such as killing all infected, including children. Having gone slightly mad after spending a lifetime fighting the aliens. The alien, Mr. Grey possessing Jonesy uses his body to escape the quarantine. Pitting him against the remaining friends with the fate of the world in balance.

There’s a lot I didn’t cover in the synopsis, as this isn’t a short film clocking in at over two hours. The later part is much faster paced than the first sections as there’s quite a lot that needs to be established. Though you don’t really feel Dreamcatchers length as it never dawdles. Moving quickly to cover as much ground as efficiently possible.

The true strength of the film lies with the core group of friends as the actors who portray them do a great job. Their interaction is believable that these men are life long friends. Bound together not just by shared history, but also by the abilities gifted to them.

My issues with this film are small. My first one with actually with Morgan Freeman’s character as he feels out-of-place. Taking up time for crazy sake. The character does little but try to add extra tension, but in the long run adds little to the actual plot of the film. Much like Owen. In fact, most of the military scenes feel superfluous.

The second is Duddits, who all the men talk about in high regard constantly. With never a bad word shared about him. But all men admit to falling out of contact with him. Even becoming surprised when they learn that he now has late stage leukemia when he’s searched out to help with Mr. Grey. So my issue is how come these men, who owe so much Duddits have fallen so far out of touch that he doesn’t even come to the annual trip? One that partly held in his honor?

Final thoughts, other than a few glaring plot holes this is an OK movie. Though nothing special, well beyond the on-screen friendship. The effects are kind of bad as the CGI hasn’t aged the best. But, Dreamcatcher isn’t a film you should be watching for the effects. It’s the one you watch for the story and overall Dreamcatcher has a pretty good one. 7/10

The Night Flier

stephen-kings-the-night-flier-movie-poster-1998-1020744678This a personal favorite of a good friend of mines. So when he heard I was doing another round of Stephen King adaptations for the Christmas season again, he heavily suggested this film. Though I knew little of this beyond it containing a vampire. So when I realized that Miguel Ferrer was front and center for the whole film. Who I just loved as Lloyd Henreid in The Stand. The Night Flier also has Dan Monahan, who is impossible to remove his roles in the Porky’s films.

The Night Flier opens with a black Sky-master airplane with red piping landing at night in a desolate air strip. The sole attendant goes out to check on the plane and finds it empty. Though he quickly set upon by an unseen attacker and is killed. In New York at The Inside View, a trashy sensationalist tabloid, Richard Dee’s (Miguel Ferrer) the paper’s chief reporter is upset that a picture was cut from his story and storms into his bosses office. Inside Katherine Blair (Julie Entwisle) is being welcomed to the paper by the chief editor Merton Morrison (Dan Monahan). Morrison offers a story to Dee’s, involving a serial killer that flies into airports and kills the attendant. Dee passes on the story and goes out drinking. He’s followed by Blair, who wants to pick his brain over the inside view of Inside View. She’s met with Dee’s short temper and scorn. The following morning when he arrives to work Dee is brought into Morrison’s office, he’s presented with more evidence to support the serial killer’s existence, information dug up by Blair. This new evidence hooks Dee’s interest and agrees to do the story, stealing it from Blair who had already got it. Dee begins tracking the killer flying the same airports and questioning anyone who will talk to him. As he draws closer to the killer, whom he names the Night Flyer, Dee becomes more and more drawn in. Though eventually the trail goes cold, but he gets help from Blair, eventually catching up to the Night Flyer…

Having not read the short story this based on I was able to enjoy this film on its own merits. Night Flyers biggest strength is actually how little the Night Flyer is involved. He’s only alluded to and talked about by those who Dee interviews. The Night Flyer is shown just enough to stay at the forefront of the film, but is always cloaked in shadow until the films final moments.

What really carries this film though is the atmosphere, which remains dark and imposing. The sense of dread cast by the Night Flyer ebbs and flows, but is always there driving the narrative. Though his mental connection to Dee is oddly out-of-place and serves no real purpose.

The acting is mostly really good. Which has a style that I find remarkably similar to Pet Cemetery. Though it does pass the line to cheesy on more than a few occasions. Though it’s really the strength Miguel Ferrer’s performance that carries the film. As his slow decent in obsession and madness here is solid and easily my favorite role of his now.

Final thoughts, like any good adaptation The Night Flyer wants me to read the story on which it was based. I loved the sly references other King stories. Mostly in the scene in Morton’s office as the past headlines. Standing on its own, divorced from King, Night Flyer is still a solid vampire. It has a dark, oppressive mood and ties to the old Dracula films. 8/10

Dolores Claiborne

64615cf8ad884695c7ac2a96717df7bcI remember this film being around when I was younger, though I have no recollection of seeing it before. My father was a huge fan of Stephen King, something that I undoubtedly inherited from him, so he was always watching the movies and I remember talking highly of this film. Which makes sense since Dolores Claiborne is a great film that’s incredibly well acted. Though I can’t think of anything Kathy Bates has been in that she didn’t do a fantastic job and here is no different. Though this a bit off from what I normally view as horror. But Dolores Claiborne did leave me with lingering feelings of unease and the film does hold true to my definition of horror. Though here it’s more a family drama with horror being muted, but still present as this is a very dark story.

Dolores Claiborne opens with Dolores Claiborne (Kathy Bates), a domestic servant having an altercation with her elderly employer, Vera Donovan (Judy Parfitt) off-screen. Vera takes a fall down the stairs and lays there badly injured as Dolores ransacks the kitchen for a rolling pin. As she stands over Vera with the pin the mailman comes in and stops her from finishing off Vera, just for Vera to die anyway. Back in New York, Dolores’s estranged daughter Selena St. George (Jennifer Jason Leigh) a journalist receives a clipping from the local paper alerting her to what’s transpired with her mother. She returns to town to help defend her mother, though she doubtful that her mother is innocent after the mysterious death of her father twenty years prior. After the two women meet, the story of Vera’s death along with the death of Joe St. George (David Strathairn), Vera’s father unfold in a series of flashbacks. Dolores is being investigated by Detective John Mackey (Christopher Plummer), the same Detective the investigated Joe’s death and while unable to prove it has always believed that Dolores killed her husband. He’s aided in his investigation by Constable Frank Stamshaw (John C. Reilly).

I like the dark tone of film. Which is matched perfectly by Kathy Bates performance. I always love Kathy Bates and I have since I first saw Misery and the Stand, both of which she was in. Here her performance is both grounded and entertaining. She isn’t over the top crazy like in Misery, but is just as forceful and memorable.

I liked the switch of color during the flashbacks. The current events are all gray and washed out making the world look cold and less hospitable. While the flash backs a bright and green. As if they’re viewing the past through rose-colored glasses. That all the bits, even the ugly ones look better in hindsight.

Final thoughts, there isn’t much more I can say other than I liked it. Not what I was expecting, but a pleasant surprise all the same.  All the actors deliver believable and solid performances. The pacing and tone are both pretty good as well, with the film never feeling slow or inconsistent. I would heavily recommend this film, though not if you’re looking for scares. But if you want a great story that leaves you feeling a little uneasy. This is a great film for that. 9/10

Needful Things

needful_things_poster_01Once again we find ourselves in another December, which means it’s time once again for Kingmas. To start it off I wanted to watch a King adaptation to start with and I wanted to be something that I was both aware of, yet had never watched. After digging through a small pile of films I settled on Needful Things from 1993, based on the 1991 novel of the same name. This was a delight to watch as I have never, at the time of writing this at least, I have never read the novel. So I was able to go in to this film blind, and judge it more or less on its own merits.

The film opens with the opening of Needful Things in the small town of Castle Rock. The business owner Leland Gaunt (Max von Sydow), sells trinkets and assorted items in the town. Everything he sells has great value to the person he’s selling too, though he never sells them for much. Just a small fee and a small favor. The first person he sells to is Brian Rusk (Shane Meier), how he sells a rare baseball card for nothing more than a few cents and the promise to pull a prank on Wilma Jerzyck (Valri Bromfield). Gaunt continues to sell items to the town for small fees and “smaller” favors. Until he comes across Sheriff Alan Pangborn (Ed Harris), who tells him that he doesn’t need anything. Something that Gaunt see’s as true. The two become at odds as Gaunt continues to sell his items with his favors becoming more and more malicious, turning the town against itself. Until the town degrades to violence with only Sheriff Pangborn standing between the town and damnation.

I love the simplicity of the plot. A man selling his wares with malicious intent. Though after looking into the novel I wish the ending would have been a little more ambiguous with whether or not Gaunt was the devil himself or just a demon like the novel. Yes, I spoil things for myself constantly.

Though Stephen King is always more about the journey than the destinations. Needful Things is a good journey to take. Mostly this is on the strength of Max von Sydow, who delivers an amazing performance as Gaunt. Both warm and menacing, mostly menacing with increasing frequency until the final moment of the film. Which I think as great as I love nothing more than a good villain and Gaunt is a great villain.

Though, I will admit that this film does have weaknesses. My main, well sole issue is that support cast isn’t the best. The quality performances that Max von Sydow and Ed Harris, both deliver performance equal to their caliber. The rest though, Shane Meier, Bonnie Bedelia, Amanda Plummer, J.T. Walsh, Ray McKinnon and Duncan Fraser all do… passable jobs. Standard fare for a King adaptation, but they do leave a bit to be desired.

Final Thoughts, while not the best horror film it is still a solid King horror film. I would place Needful Things well below the Mist, but above Cat’s Eye.  The performances are excellent to passable with the scale tipping towards passable. The pacing is also only OK, never truly engaging, but never so slow it viewing it becomes tedious. I would recommend this film to fans of King adaptations and to fans of films with memorable villains. Even if the film offers little else. 8/10

Phantoms

phantoms.26225There’s something to be said for the kind of horror movie that while not actually scary, at least in my opinion anyway, remains incredibly re-watchable. Maybe Phantoms is scary, but lost some of the chills somewhere around the twentieth viewing. Strangely I feel that Phantoms may be more well-known from the Kevin Smith film Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back, rather than for its own merits. Though I do have to agree that Ben Affleck is pretty bomb in this film, he’s not the best performance. That doesn’t even go to Peter O’Toole, but rather Liev Schreiber. Who does a fantastic job and simply nails it. Phantoms is part of a personal stable of horror films that always get dragged out when I watch to watch a film, something that is familiar. So I don’t have to give it my full attention and it has been since I first saw it. Because honestly for a nearly twenty year old film, it’s held up incredibly well.

Phantoms opens with Doctor Jennifer Pailey (Joanna Going) bringing her little sister Lisa (Rose McGowan) to the small tourist town of Snowfeild, Colorado, where she works. When the sisters arrive, they find the town empty and after finding the body of Jennifer’s housekeeper, then a few other bodies. The pair then find the heads of the local bakers in their oven, before running into Sheriff Bryce Hammond (Ben Affleck) and his two deputies, Deputy Stuart “Stu” Wargle (Liev Schreiber) and Deputy Steve Shanning (Nicky Katt). The group is led by an unseen presence to a hotel where they find no one alive. But do find a note scrawled on the mirror “Timothy Flyte, The Ancient Enemy”, in a windowless bathroom, locked from the inside. Sheriff Hammond manages to contact headquarters to call for back up, but is basically only able to relay Flyte’s name before communications once again breaks up and becoming impossible. Flyte (Peter O’Toole) is contacted by the government, who are responding to the events of Snowfeild in a big way, and explains his theory of The Ancient Enemy, citing famous disappearances of small populations throughout history. Before being dragged off to Snowcloak…

Phantoms biggest advantage is that unlike a number of films from its era is that it doesn’t really use that much special effects. Sure the last act has a mixture of CGI and Practical thrown in, but by and large the film just relies on tension. The not seeing being what scary. Though this abandon during the last section of the film, when the film quickly devolves into a creature feature. A good one though.

Liev Schreiber is by far my favorite part of this film and I really like Ben Affleck in this movie. Same goes with Rose McGowan, Peter O’Toole though I’m about fifty-fifty on. Schreiber is creepy and off-putting in every second of screen time he graces. Heck, I find Stu scarier than The Ancient Enemy. Which upon reflection, was probably the point.

Final Thoughts, I really love this film and is certainly among my personal favorites. But honestly does feel rocky in the later half of the film. It’s not that the film dips in quality, there’s just a tone shift that I find jarring. There’s also a handful of CGI Effects that have aged poorly, especially in comparison the rest of the film. Still both those flaws are a matter of taste than substance. 10/10 Also Phantoms is based on the Dean Koontz novel of the same name.

Odd Thomas

odd-thomas-mainOdd Thomas wasn’t as odd a film as I thought it would be going in. But is a very fun twist on the “I see dead people and have to help trope”. Which is both nice and refreshing. Odd Thomas is also an adaptation of a book of the same name by horror/suspense author Dean Koontz an author I like and feel guilty about for not reading more of his work. Odd Thomas plays out more like a detective film than it does as a horror film. Not to say that it skimps on the horror, because it doesn’t. Odd Thomas does a great job building an impending sense of dread by making it one of the main focuses of the film. Then tries to deliver an equally excellent bout of revulsion only for it fall a little flat.

Odd Thomas is about.. well, Odd Thomas (Anton Yelchin) a short order cook who can see dead people. But he does, he goes does something about it. Odd’s secret is known to only a few, his girlfriend Stormy Llewellyn (Addison Timlin) and Police Chief Wyatt Porter (Willem Dafoe). One night Odd has a dream where faceless people are asking for his aid from a gun man who shoots them all, including Odd. The next day at Odd’s work a strange man nicked named Fungus Bob (Shuler Hensley) comes into his diner, crawling with creatures that only Odd can see called Bodachs. Creatures that feed off evil and carnage. Naturally he begins worrying as Bodachs only appear when great violence is about to unfold. Odd uses one of his other psychic gifts, psychic magnetism to follow and find Fungus Bob. Which leads him to his girlfriends work, then to Bob’s home. Where he breaks in and finds a portal to hell… also Odd finds out that Fungus Bob is way into serial killers. Odd informs the police chief about Bob resulting in the chief having him watched by two officers. Later that night while having dinner in the belfry a local church, Odd and Stormy are attacked by Bob, but they manage to escape him. After Odd and Stormy escape Bob trashes the church, although when the police arrive Bob is already gone and there’s nothing linking him to the crime. Odd’s psychic magnetism leads him to a local bowling alley where he finds the staff wearing the uniforms of the faceless people from his nightmare. As he and Stormy head home, they hear a woman scream and Odd races off to see if he can help. When he arrives, Odd finds Lysette Spinelli (Melissa Ordway) dead, mauled to death by dogs. A man who arrived on the scene before Odd, shot the dogs in an attempt to save Lysette. After returning Stormy home, Odd slips away from police surveillance and heads back to his place. When he arrives, Odd finds Fungus Bob’s body in his bathtub. Long since dead, causing Odd to realize that Fungus Bob was a ghost at the church. But if Bob isn’t the shooter, who is?

Odd Thomas is hard to sum up. Strange guy that can see ghosts must stop a mass murder before it happens. But the twists, while nothing new is incredibly well used. This might be due to Odd Thomas being an adaptation. So as films normally leave out a lot of content. So if they were able to cram all of this into the film. What didn’t?

The acting does feel a bit off to me. I can’t quite get my finger on it. But something about the delivery of the lines feels awkward and while well written it doesn’t really flow well. But it’s funny, well most of the time. Though this is mostly the writing and not the performance. Even Willem Defoe suffers from this here and I’ve loved just about everything I’ve seen him in.

Final thoughts, its good and I really liked it. The dark, dry humor really worked for me and while the acting deoes bug me a little. It never approaches terrible. It just feels off to me. The story does feel a bit formulaic, but not in a bad way. It feels fresh when I know it shouldn’t. All that said, it’s good and would recommend it. 7/10

Pontypool

pontypoolPontypool should have just went with zombies. As the reasoning behind the zombie like “Conversationlists” is a bit-far flung for my suspension of disbelief. I have a feeling that it worked better in the novel Pontypool’s based on, Pontypool Changes Everything by Tony Burgess. Pontypool has some intense, well shot moments and characters that are both like-able and relatable. There are far more things I like about Pontypool than I dislike and I want to make that clear. Director Bruce McDonald crafts a solid horror film that delivers on the horror.

Pontypool starts with radio shock jock Grant Mazzy (Stephen McHattie) driving to work on a dark, snowy day in the small town of Pontypool. At a red light a woman in distress appears out the dark and snow, bangs on his passenger window, mumbles something that can be heard over the storm before she fades back in the darkness. Unable to see the woman and unnerved, continues to work where he greeted by his co-workers Laurel-Ann Drummond (Georgina Reilly), the audio tech and Sydney Briar (Lisa Houle). Shortly after starting to air, they get unconfirmed reports of a riot of some kind at the office Dr. Mendez (Hrant Alianak). Their weather reporter Ken Lonely (Rick Roberts) calls in describing the scene as chaos with people acting crazed before being cut off. The crew scrabbles to get some kind of confirmation from the police or official channels, but are unable to reach anyone. Ken calls back after taking refuge in a grain silo and describes the scene. As people are trying to eat their way inside of one another before tearing themselves apart. They are also repeating words and phrases. An infected man crashes through the wall after Ken, who becomes blocked by an emergency transmission in French. Laurel-Ann translates the message, which declares Pontypool under quarantine, tells every to stay indoors and avoid terms of endearment along with the English language. Beliving now to be the victim of a hoax or cruel joke Mazzy tries to leave the station when it becomes assaulted by dozens of infected. After barricading the doors, the group’s joined by Dr. Mazzy, who sneaks in through a window, just as Laurel-Ann starts to succumb to the virus, repeating the word Missing and mimicking the sound of a tea kettle. Dr. Mazzy gets Syndney and Mazzy into the sound proof, sound booth. The three watch as Laurel-Ann worsens and the infected breach the station…

I the small cast works incredibly well in this story, as you’re just in the dark to what’s going on as the characters are. The sense of dread is palpitate as the film continues, but does peter out a bit towards the end. The main cast does outstanding work, with Georgina Reilly doing an amazing job. Stephen McHattie, who I mistake for Lance Henriksen far too often and Lisa Houle play great off each other. Though their love story-line feels incredibly shoehorned in and comes kind of out of nowhere. Which is odd as they’re married in real life. The only performance that I didn’t enjoy was Hrant Alianak, who I can’t fault as he was given some of the worst exposition to dump.

My favorite part of Pontypool is after Laurel-Ann’s infected and we get to watch her deteriorate mentally. Which takes place at the same time as Dr. Mazzy gives the worst explanation for what’s happening. That words have become infected and our understanding them allows the virus to propagate. Words are infected. Words. It’s just the worst possible reasoning. Maybe it was better explained and explored in the novel. But here it feels like a hot mess.

The film is simply and at time elegantly shot. With the limitations of the story and set, Bruce McDonald did a great job. Even if his vision did come out a bit like a rehashing of zombies, at the least it felt fresh.

Final thoughts, Good but flawed is how I can best sum up Pontypool. It could have done without trying to explain what was going on or least done so less ham-handedly. Still, it does deliver on the fronts of both dread and revulsion. Crafting an entertaining narrative with strong characters and would easily recommend this film. 8/10

A Good Marriage

178022Based on the 2010 novella of the same name by Stephen King, A Good Marriage is a straightforward film. With few, if any twists and turns, the only plot twists being once that are blatant and easily predictable. That said, I still liked this movie, Joan Allen and Anthony LaPaglia do a great job with the material, portraying their characters as both believable and sympathetic. Much of the films run time is dedicated not to the violence, but the emotional repercussions felt by Joan Allen’s character Darcy. I find myself in agreeance with most critiques of this film, in that it falls flat and fails to live up to Kings ability’s as an immersive storyteller.

A Good Marriage tells the story of Darcy Anderson (Joan Allen) and her discovery after twenty-five years of marriage, that Bob Anderson (Anthony LaPaglia), her husband and father of their two children, Petra (Kristen Connolly) and Donnie (Theo Stockman) is a widely feared serial killer known as Beadie. While searching for batteries in the garage while Bob is away on business, Darcy comes across a small box made by their daughter for Bob as a gift by their daughter stashed away in a hidden cubby in the wall. Inside she finds Beadie’s latest victims ID and general wallet card stuff stored away. While talking with Darcy, Bob notices something is up and returns home and discovers that Darcy has discovered his secret. The two talk and Bob agrees to stop his extracurricular murderous actives, while stating that he would never let his alter ego Beadie hurt her…

The rest of the film just a slow build up going just about exactly where you think it would go. But who knows, maybe A Good Marriage will surprise you.  The premise is incredibly solid, which is expected given the source material. The main issue is the films incredibly mute tone. Bob never came off as dangerous, sure we hear about the things he’s done. But that’s not the light we see him in, given that is the basis of the film, he’s supposed to be mild-mannered. But regardless, while Anthony LaPaglia does do a great job, I never find him threatening.

In fact, I really liked all the acting in this film, with the star of the hour (actually hour and forty-two minutes) is most certainly Stephen Lang, who in my opinion blew everyone else out of the water. I like LaPaglia and Allen in this film, but I love Stephen Lang here.  It’s a pity that he doesn’t make a real appearance until very close to the end of the film.

Honestly, my only beef with this film is the pacing. I was just too slow, with nothing ever feeling pressing. I tend to dislike films that feel longer than they are. Sure, once in a while you get a film that feels like it takes forever and it’s still great, looking at you Dances With Wolves. But A Good Marriage isn’t one of these occasions.

Final thoughts, meh. It’s worth a watch. At the time of writing this A Good Marriage is on Netflix and if you have the hour and forty-two minutes to spend A Good Marriage is worth the investment. But I wouldn’t go so far as to say that it’s worth hunting down. 7/10